<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
        <?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="http://blog.ngas.ch/styles/feed.css"?>
<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
 xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
>
<channel>
<title>Filed under: suisses | Pas un Geek en tant que tel</title>
<atom:link href="http://blog.ngas.ch/archives/suisses/index-rss.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
<link>http://blog.ngas.ch</link>
<description>No Geek As Such</description>
<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
<dc:creator><a href=&quot;https://plus.google.com/114292582268779510325&quot;>Tonnerre Lombard</a></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2011-12-12T21:20:42+01:00</dc:date>
<admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://nanoblogger.sourceforge.net" />

<item>
<link>http://blog.ngas.ch/archives/2007/08/28/anne-louise_germaine/index.html</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://blog.ngas.ch/archives/2007/08/28/anne-louise_germaine/index.html</guid>
<title>Anne-Louise Germaine</title>
<dc:date>2007-08-28T23:48:50+01:00</dc:date>
<dc:creator>Tonnerre Lombard</dc:creator>
<dc:subject> suisses</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[<p>
 Anne-Louise Germaine, also known as &laquo;Mme. de Sta&euml;l, was a
 philosophically engaged swiss noble in the 18th/19th century.
</p>
<p>
 A famous statement of Mme. de Sta&euml;l is this one:<br/>
 <i>La tristesse fait p&eacute;n&eacute;trer bien plus avant dans le
  charact&egrave;re et la destin&eacute;e de l'homme, que toute autre
  disposition de l'homme.</i>
</p>
<p>
 I think that from a biologist's point of view, this statement surely
 can't be discarded easily, because one of the first things babies learn
 is unhappiness. However, I don't think that happiness is the same as,
 or even related to, sadness. It is more a state of being discontent,
 and thus should probably be named adequately. Happiness and containedness
 is not the same thing, not at all. Containedness means that a being
 has successfully fulfilled all of its desires and doesn't have any
 immediate desire at the point in time. This mostly occurrs paired
 with being busy with hobbies.
</p>
<p>
 True sadness, however, is not related to being unhappy, or
 &laquo;discontained&raquo;. It is also possible that a lot of people
 have not yet been truly sad. For one, I don't think I have.
</p>
<p>
 True sadness is the state that is being reached when losing someone
 or something really important. And by really important I don't mean
 important for the fulfillment of everyday's needs, required for reaching
 a state of containedness. Losing &laquo;just&raquo; a boyfriend or
 girlfriend is nothing that could probably cause sadness. It caused
 unhappiness, unrest, and the demand for replacement. (Which could
 possibly serve as an adequate definition of unhappiness.)
</p>
<p>
 True sadness is experienced when losing someone who has been part of
 your life for so long as to shape it significantly. This, in my opinion,
 constitutes a significant loss. Most boy- and girlfriends don't really
 shape one's life all that much; in fact we ignore the requirement to
 let them shape us so we can love them at all. True love is not possible
 with someone who would not constitute a significant loss.
</p>
<p>
 Melancholy is a related subject, because it is entirely different. It
 appears to be a state where people don't expect too much from each
 other. While most people regard it as a bad state which makes people
 &laquo;sad&raquo;, I think it is a significant, beautiful state of
 mind. Melancholy allows people to reduce the perception of their
 own needs, and to see that of the needs of other people. It is not
 a disease to disrespect the requirement to be contained which is
 imposed on us by the modern society (or the Major Consensus Narrative),
 but a gift. Melancholy does not necessary have to lead to depression,
 it can also lead to great pleasure and happiness.
</p>
<p>
 Probably the most impressive quotation of Mme. de Sta&euml; is the
 following:<br/>
 <i>Le seul syst&ecirc;me vrai pour &eacute;viter la douleur, c'est de
  ne diriger sa vie que d'apr&ecirc;s ce qu'on peut faire pour les
  autres, mais non d'apr&ecirc;s ce qu'on attend d'eux.</i>
</p>
<p>
 This is a thought that I realized is also a very important leading
 idea of my own life. I think that one of the most important rules of
 diplomacy is also true for any other type of interaction involving
 sentient beings: it is ill advised to expect others to do something
 specific. Thus, it is also ill-advised to do something for others
 expecting a reward for this.
</p>
<p>
 One has to realize that a lot of favors are only done because some
 type of reward is expected for this. But unless the reward is immediate,
 it is not likely to happen (Or, for that matter, to be really a reward.
 Most of the time a &laquo;perceived reward&raquo; is received for something,
 it is indeed a favor done because something else, something immediate,
 is desired. It is important to realize that at least humans always want
 something.
</p>
<p>
 Thus, it is not really interesting how much people do for each other, but
 it is indeed much more interesting to look for things that you can do for
 others without catching yourself trying it for a reward. I invite you to
 go out and do people a favor, not doing it because one expects them to be
 a good partner, because one expects money, or because one even expects
 a smile or a &laquo;thank you&raquo;. You might be deceived.
</p>
<p>
 Just do something that you know will help other people, ignoring completely
 the fact that they might show a reaction. Expect them to walk on by, not
 even blinking at you. Don't prejudge them to do this, but don't expect
 <u>anything</u>.
</p>
<p>
 Once you've reached a level where giving people this kind of favor makes
 you glad, you have understood the true spirit of this statement.
</p>]]></description>

</item>
<item>
<link>http://blog.ngas.ch/archives/2007/05/08/auguste_piccard/index.html</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://blog.ngas.ch/archives/2007/05/08/auguste_piccard/index.html</guid>
<title>Auguste Piccard</title>
<dc:date>2007-05-08T08:03:26+01:00</dc:date>
<dc:creator>Tonnerre Lombard</dc:creator>
<dc:subject> suisses</dc:subject>
<description><![CDATA[<p>
 <i>Auguste Piccard</i> was the creator of the highest-flying baloon with a
 passenger capsule which kept its pressure, allowing the passengers to rise
 to higher places than if they had to sustain the normal pressures. Using
 this capsule, he has managed to transport passangers in a height of
 23 kilometers above sea level.
</p>
<p>
 Professeur Tournesol (Professor Bienlein) from Tim and Struppi was drafted
 after Auguste Piccard, and the M&eacute;soscaphe PX-8 was called after him.
 Also, Captain Jean-Luc Picard from Star Trek TNG was drafted to be a
 grandson of Auguste Piccard.
</p>
<p>
 Born 1884 in Basel, he died in 1962 in Lausanne.
</p>]]></description>

</item>
</channel>
</rss>

